The Mystery of the Ordinary
A couple of weeks ago, after I had finished the final Harry Potter novel, I wrote a couple of paragraphs about the appeal of these stories. It is a novel where kids and adults witness Harry experience new, exciting and terrifying things almost always for the first time. Even the most mundane and insignificant encounter is dramatic and memorable for Harry. Of course, in the novels, Harry experiences the fantastic as well. This transformation of the mundane into the extraordinary is something that occurs regularly in the life of a child. And this is perhaps why the novels are so appealing. As adults we may have vague memories of that transformation and through the novels we glimpse dimly into those cherished experiences. For the child reader, it is the best of both worlds. G.K. Chesterton says that these types of stories will endure because they place an ordinary character within the extraordinary.
The old fairy tale makes the hero a normal human boy; it is his adventures that are startling; they startle him because he is normal…You can make a story out of a hero among dragons; but not out of a dragon among dragons. The fairy tale discusses what a sane man will do in a mad world.
In fact, Chesterton applifies my own sentiments of this joy of discovery.
This is proved by the fact that when we are very young children we do not need fairy tales: we only need tales. Mere life is interesting enough. A child of seven is excited by being told that Tommy opened a door and saw a dragon. But a child of three is excited by being told that Tommy opened a door. Boys like romantic tales; but babies like realistic tales — because they find them romantic
I see this often in the lives of my own children. The young child is living the romantic and mystic life at every step as new encounters, people and experiences bombard his inquisitive and naive sense and open his heart and mind to the wider world around him. This is why proper education (or even facilitation) is important. This activity of timely and responsible disclosure that leads and allows children to discover the wonder of world is perhaps one of the finest things we can do. Sadly, because we have lost that feeling of wonder and live in the mundane, we have forgotten the excitement, enchantment and magic of the world that our children experience at every turn.




Lisa V on 27 Oct 2007 at 6:07 am #
This is very interesting! I haven’t let Micah read this series (and I’m still not sure I will) But He LOVES to read ~ He can if I let him read a book like this a week!
What do you think about all the controversy in re: to the books and children? Re: witchcraft and homosexuality (just asking your opinion because you like to read books he’d be interested in and I haven’t read them yet)
He was in 4th grade and I let him read The Golden Compass ~ now I’m hearing that the author is an anti-Christian and wants to kill God in his books… but Micah didn’t come away with that at all. (This movie is coming out soon ~ with Nicole Kidman)
Anyway… I love that he’s like me ~ and loves to read… I love that he has an awesome imagination (considering God only gave us one child and he needs it) BUT I was just wondering what you thought in re: to subtle messages etc…
What kind of crazy lady gets up at 5:30 on a Saturday morning anyway?
Love you guys
Lisa
roodee on 27 Oct 2007 at 9:10 pm #
You raise some interesting questions. Unfortunately, this medium is challenging for any sort of dialectic endeavor. As a start I would ask what particular principles are used to derive your general rules for censorship. After understanding what these principles are it may be useful to evaluate whether these principles have sound reasons (theological, pragmatic, etc).
To answer your first question though, I attempt to avoid certain novels that expose my children to ideas that I have not personally discussed with them. The rationale I used with my oldest (that seems to work so far) is that reading/watching/hearing certain things has a tendency to “grow her up” faster than she was designed to. This, as you can see, is purely pragmatic. This is only for those overt activities and themes present within novels.
As for “witchcraft” in Harry Potter, it is hard to argue that they use magic as their means for manipulating the world around them. Having said that, it is equally hard to claim that such fictive accounts having any grounding in reality. Even if they did, given that it is a work of fiction, what is the risk? Is it that a child may become curious? Surely it is not that a child will become “infected” somehow. Furthermore, if the child is of an appropriate age, he can surely distinguish between reality and “make-believe”. This is why “make-believe” is so much fun. It bends the rules which we are all under. As you can see, there are numerous “principles” at play here that a post cannot easily cover without additional questions and answers, but maybe this gives you enough to think about to enumerate your principles and put them under the microscope of personal inquiry.
-rudy
Lisa V on 28 Oct 2007 at 4:43 pm #
Thanks!
oh and I’m glad you didn’t answer my last question!
Have a great work week
lisa